Word of the year: Liberticide

There is really only one word that describes what the national Socialist Left is doing these days to the cause of freedom: Liberticide.

The Oxford English dictionary defines the term liberticide as follows:

Liberticide
noun
Destruction or removal of liberty.
noun
A destroyer of liberty.
adjective
Destructive of liberty; liberticidal.
Origin
Late 18th century; earliest use found in Morning Star. From liberty + –cide, apparently after French liberticide

late 18th century; earliest use found in Star. From liberty + –icide, in use as adjective and probably also in use as noun after French liberticide.

Like most words that revolve around the concept of Freedom, the origin of the word Liberticide, or it’s adjective liberticidal comes from the Latin liberalis, from liber ‘free (man)’.

This is also the root source of many other terms: Liberalis, Liberation, Libertarian, Libertine as well as Liberal.

This was joined with a combining form that denotes ‘a person or substance that kills’ or ‘an act of killing’

In many ways this word perfectly encapsulates what is currently taking place in the states and around the world. While they take great pains to deceive the public in their true objectives, the Left has become full liberticidal in it’s zeal for power.

Leftists efforts at Liberticide disguised with word play.

Of course the Left cannot openly admit that their Socialist national agenda is in opposition to freedom. Instead they use ersatz terms with negative connotations to hide their true intentions. Free-speech is supplanted with “Hate speech” – despite it having no set definition. However, as they say in the electrical engineering field, that’s a feature, not a bug. By the same token they attack the basic human Liberty of self-preservation with still other undefined terms such as “Assault Weapon” or “Military Style” which can mean almost anything.  This means they can attack those basic Liberties while maintaining the false pretense of supporting the 1st or 2nd amendments.

As of late they have become increasingly shrill in their attacks on these Liberties, but thanks to the magic of deceptive word play, they don’t have to admit to others or feel guilty about attacking Liberty. They can still pretend to be ‘Liberal’ [With unfortunate help from our side.. ahem] while being liberticidal at the same time.

Originally published on the NOQ Report

Advertisements

A Memo to the Liberty Grabbers of the Left from the Pro-Liberty Right.


Hat Tip: Nazis Are Socialists (Meso)

A dose of reality for you Leftists opposing freedom on behalf of the gun owners of America.

Seeing that we gun owners been your rhetorical punching bag for
several weeks, there are a few things we would like to point out to you
folks opposed to the most essential of Liberties. You’ve spent all
manner of airtime talking down to us, dictating what we ‘need’
with regard to our basic human rights. So now it is time for you to
listen to a couple of brutal truths in the matter. These aren’t going to
be ‘politically correct’, by any means, but such is usually not the case with cold hard reality.

From your ever so self laudatory language, you Liberty grabbers on
the Left like to think of yourselves as noble warriors, out there ‘changing the world’ for the ‘Common good’ [Gemeinnutz in the German vernacular]. Fighting for Socialister. Social ‘Justice’ and all manner of flowery folderol [Cue mournful violin music]. Yes, you think of yourselves as ‘sacrificing’ for the ‘the children*’
no matter what that entails. Whether it’s all manner of fame on Youtube
or Facebook, to endless praise from your echo chamber, there are no
limits as to your willingness to signal your virtue to everyone.

*Unborn children excluded

Well, sorry to break it to you, but in the words of the Marchers: “We call BS!”

The fact is there is nothing more selfish than demanding that others be deprived of their ‘essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety’
for yourselves. You want others to sacrifice their freedom for some
mythical gains in your perceived security. It would be one thing for you
to give up your Liberty, but that isn’t the case is it? You are
marching to demand that the basic human rights of others be stripped
from them, that is self-centred in the extreme.

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” ― Abraham Lincoln

Empathy is a very important human quality, so perhaps you should
consider giving up some of your essential liberties to understand what
is at stake for those of us on the Pro-Liberty side of the aisle. Maybe
you should demand that you be stripped of your First amendment rights?
Or perhaps Liberty Grabbers groups should be licensed before they can
demand that others be deprived of their rights?

Oh, what’s that you say? You have a Constitutional right to free-speech or freedom of the press? That those rights ‘Shall not be infringed’? [to coin a phrase] Or that the slightest amount will lead to a slippery slope towards the loss of them all. Welcome to our world,
where every time a Leftist lunatic decides to go on a mass murder
spree, our Constitutional rights are suddenly on the chopping block.
With it just being a question of how much of those rights we’re going to lose – if not everything.

Can we dictate what you ‘need’ in exercising your Rights?

Can we demand that you justify the keeping of your liberties? Can we arbitrarily decree that certain modes of speech are ‘Militaristic’ in style? Do you really ‘need’ to appear on the Tele 30 times a day? Do you really need a ‘high capacity’ smart phone? Do you really need to fire off 5 tweets in a minute just to kill off a basic human right?

Hypocrisy on parade: Liberty Grabbers have guns to protect themselves while denying that right to others.

Please note that the people in the Liberty Grabber movement you
idolize are also complete hypocrites in that while they work tirelessly
to take away our property and our Liberty, they are safe and secure
surrounded by ARMED security. Yes, think about it, the people who rail
against guns have no problem being protected by them. Were they to be
true to their words, they would disarm their security details. If
Citibank and Bank of America didn’t care to be hypocrites they would
dismiss their armed security and announce it to the world.
Oh, they have to deal with threats? So do the rest of us – and yet they want to make everyone else vulnerable to those threats while they stay safe and secure.

Here’s a hard dose of reality for you: We gun owners protect everyone, even you Liberty Grabbers.

The truth is that while you uselessly virtue signal your inestimable
magnanimity, it is those of us on the Pro-liberty side who work to keep
you people safe. This may come as a shock, but if you live in one of the
states or localities that value Liberty, you are around concealed
weapons every time you go out in public. Yes, you might find this to be
too scary to think about, but every day you are protected by the
deterrence effect of ordinary folks just like you [aside from their cherishing freedom that is] carrying around *Gasp* Firearms hidden from view.

Consequently, you don’t know who might be carrying a gun…. and neither do the criminals.
Thus the value of an armed citizenry. They don’t know who may have the
means to defend themselves, so they don’t know who to victimize,
therefore everyone is protected.

The exception being The “Gun-Free” zone, that vestige of the
Utopian fantasy world of the Left. Most mass shootings take place where
the innocent are denied their basic human Liberty of self-defence. So
what does that mean for you Leftists of the so-called “Party of Science”? It means that your absurd idea that a sign will stop a mass murder results in dead children. That is what you want everywhere, how does that even reach the threshold of rationality?

If you aren’t going to thank us for keeping you safe, could you at least leave us alone?

So why is all of this important? Because the people you have demonisd
for weeks are the ones keeping you safe. Those you label as terrorist,
splattered in blood are the people providing for your security. How is that for irony?

  • We’re the ones who take the time endure the draconian hurdles put in the way of our basic human rights.
  • We’re the ones who take the time to select the proper firearm and holster to carry concealed out in public.
  • We’re the ones who practice with our weapons in case an emergency arises.
  • We’re the ones who carry a cellphone and extra magazines for that potential emergency.
  • And We’re the ones who will most likely have to deal myriad legal
    problem and legal fees for merely protecting ourselves, our families and even you people should it be necessary.

Now, we don’t expect you people to grateful for this protection you
are afforded. Goodness knows you wouldn’t lower yourself to talk to
those of us on the Pro-liberty side. But could you at least acknowledge the effort and perhaps stop obsessing over taking away our Liberty that keeps you safe?

 

Originally published on the NOQ Report.

 

Remember: We’ve always been at war with Global Cooling.

The cyclic nature of climate means the hysteria can only be exploited for a limited time, and it’s running short.

When it comes to creating deceptive labels the national socialist
Left is par excellence, despite failing at everything else. Their self
labeling as ‘Liberals’ while having a collectivist ideology has to be one of the best examples. However, nothing shows their true genius for mendacity than their use of the of the term ‘Climate Change’ instead of the phrases ‘Global Warming’ or ‘Global Cooling’.

This is one of those vague terms with a ‘Heads we win, Tails we win’
sort of quality that works in any environment. It’s a plain fact of
reality that the climate always changes, so they can claim prescience no
matter happens. It’s use also gives them one of the greatest strawman
arguments of all time, the ever deceitful pejorative ‘Climate Change denier’.
No one actually denies that the climate changes, but this doesn’t stop
them from tarring their opponents with this scurrilous accusation at
every turn.

Global Cooling then Global Warming then Climate Change and then back to Global Cooling.

The past few decades happened to be in the upward part of a
never-ending cycle of change that has taken place as long as the planet
has existed. This let the climate cult cast the increasing temperatures
as ‘Global Warming’. When this decelerated the infamous phrase
‘Climate change’ became popular with talk about what to make of the
‘pause’ in global warming. Soon enough people began to notice that globe
wasn’t really getting warmer, and islands that were supposed to sink
beneath rising sea levels defied conventional wisdom and began growing in size.

Only a bit of fancy footwork with the language helped ‘hide the decline’ in the fortunes of global warming.. pardon..
Climate change. Normal weather events were recast as being extreme,
while lack of major hurricanes over long time periods ignored until they
returned once again. Instead of mere winter storms that have occurred
for millennia, they were labeled with hurricane style names and said to
be bombs or explosive. People are going to begin questioning why are we
making sacrifices to the carbon gods when the planet really isn’t
burning up?

Scientists are predicting ‘mini ice age’.

Still further, the bad news for the climate cult is that soon enough
the cycle turn to a downward trend showing it to be just hysteria over
something that is naturally recurring.

From Sky News: Scientists predict ‘mini ice age’ could hit UK by 2030

A mathematical model of the Sun’s magnetic activity
suggests temperatures could start dropping here from 2021, with the
potential for winter skating on the River Thames by 2030. A team led by
maths professor Valentina Zharkova at Northumbria University built on
work from Moscow to predict the movements of two magnetic waves produced
by the Sun. It predicts rapidly decreasing magnetic waves for three
solar cycles beginning in 2021 and lasting 33 years. Very low magnetic
activity on the Sun correspond with historically documented cold periods
on Earth.

This reality will not sit well with the climate cult, they’ve made a
living over carbon indulgences the past few decades while using their
hysteria to try to control every aspect of our lives. It has met some
‘resistance’, apparently we’re supposed to believe that the main driver
of climate – The SUN – has a less of an influence effect than an ancillary effect of the sun, and not from the main green house gas to boot.

From the Washington Post: No, Earth is not heading toward a ‘mini ice age’

It’s a dramatic idea, but it isn’t being embraced by many
climate scientists, who argue that anthropogenic global warming —
brought on by a human outpouring of greenhouse gas emissions into the
atmosphere — will far outweigh any climate effects that might be caused
by the sun. As far as the solar variations go, “The effect is a drop in
the bucket, a barely detectable blip, on the overall warming trajectory
we can expect over the next several decades from greenhouse warming,”
said Michael Mann, distinguished professor of meteorology at
Pennsylvania State University, in an e-mail to The Washington Post.

Worse yet, there are actual reports from the periodical Scientific
American that state in essence, “pollution is helping to cool the
climate, masking some of the global warming that’s occurred so far.” Cleaning Up Air Pollution May Strengthen Global Warming.

For now, the Climate Cult is showing their best perversion of the scientific method attacking any who dare to utter words that challenge their orthodoxy.
They may only have once choice, going back to flogging the cause of
Global Cooling or wait until the cycle begins again, hoping no one will
remember this hysteria, time will only tell.

 

Originally published on the NOQ Report

Socialism is for suckers: Venezuela

 

Since socialists are unwilling or unable to look at what their
philosophy does to people, Firewall host Bill Whittle shows us what it
is doing to the animals, and asks how the richest
person in Venezuela just happens to be the daughter of the socialist
former President of that starving country.

H/T: Bill Whittle.com

Then there is what the Socialist Regime of Nicolas Maduro is doing to the people:

It’s not What You Know, it’s What You’ve Documented

The 85-page report, “Crackdown on Dissent: Brutality, Torture, and Political Persecution in Venezuela,”
documents 88 cases involving at least 314 people, many of whom
described being subjected to serious human rights violations in Caracas
and 13 states between April and September 2017. Security force personnel
beat detainees severely and tortured them with electric shocks,
asphyxiation, sexual assault, and other brutal techniques. Security
forces also used disproportionate force and carried out violent abuses
against people in the streets, and arbitrarily arrested and prosecuted
government opponents. While it was not the first crackdown on dissent
under Maduro, the scope and severity of the repression in 2017 reached
levels unseen in Venezuela in recent memory.

H/T:  Caracas chronicles

We need to call it Liberty Control instead of Gun Control.

The current debate is over Liberty and Freedom, the national
Socialist Left wants it to be about scary objects they don’t understand.

“She who defines the terms, wins the debate”

For all of their inherent faults, one must have a begrudging respect
for our comrades on the national Socialist-Left in how they exploit
language to very good effect. They enforce an iron discipline when it
comes to the words they use to frame the discussion to their cynical
advantage. An article in The Atlantic exemplified this with: Don’t Call It ‘Gun Control’.  Or more recently in New York magazine: ‘Gun Control’ Has Outlived Its Usefulness

While we will never adopt it’s immoral base ideology of collectivism, it is time we maintained the same discipline in the words we use. This occurs in various instances, with the incorrect use of the term Liberal being the most prominent, but that is for another column.

The debate is rightfully over the cause of Liberty, so why not act like it?

At present the important point is that we use the term ‘Liberty’ in place of the word ‘gun’ in the discussion over the common sense human right of self-defence. It is the underlying issue of the debate over the 2nd amendment. A Pew research poll from last June showed that For most gun owners, owning a firearm is tied to their personal freedom.  The best way to convince non-gun owners of this critical issue [ aside from taking them to the range having fun shooting an EBR ] would be to instantly frame the debate as being over Liberty instead of guns.

It is absurd to ascribe rights or controls to inanimate objects, but
that is the implication when using those terms instead of the underlying
issue. Consider some other essential topics of freedom such as the
right to vote or the right to privacy, would we really talk about a ‘War on ballots’ or ‘assault search warrants’ instead?

Framing the debate over Liberty instead of scary objects the Left doesn’t understand.

The national Socialist-Left would love to keep this debate framed as one over scary looking pieces of aluminium instead of freedom. Even though polling has shown there are about 120 Million gun owners
in the country, many have no direct experience with firearms. Still
further many gun owners don’t have personal experience with every aspect
of the issue. Sad to say, but many people don’t care about subjects
that do not impact their lives directly. Never the less, they do care
about the subject of Liberty, they can see as something immediately
important to them.

Just compare the emotional influence of a polling question with just one word difference Liberty in place of Gun:

Do you favour more gun control?

Do you favour more Liberty control?

That changes the thinking from that of objects to one that personally impacts their lives. This Liberty instead of Gun phraseology also goes directly to the heart of the Left’s deceptive use of the term ‘Liberal’.
Even if they don’t know it implicitly, both words have the same
underlying meaning – they both come from the same root word after all.

The Takeaway.

It should be obvious why the national Socialist Left does things in a
certain way with an iron grip on words being at the forefront.
Revealing the underlying issues will cause them to lose the argument. So
now, en mass they are playing games with language the use to avoid the
word ‘Control’ but still framing the debate as one over inanimate objects. They’ve begun to use the alternative phrase ‘gun reform’ but this is still an issue over everyone’s freedom. Thus a phrase such as ‘Liberty reform’ will nail them to the wall as to their true intent.

Originally published on the NOQ Report

 

The Venezuelan secret police: Socialism can only be implemented & maintained by FORCE.

The ugly truth of socialism is that it has to be implemented at the
point of a gun. But this brutal reality is hardly amenable to recruit
new acolytes, so the socialist-left does what it does best – it lies and
abjectly denies the truth of its base ideology. One of its favorite
techniques for this involves pretending that collectivist regimes of
past and present weren’t or aren’t actually collectivist.

Curiously enough, the Socialist-Left will initially praise said
regimes and then suddenly change their tune when they inevitably fail to
work as promised. Then they will either feign ignorance or perpetuate
the astonishing lie that said regimes are really ‘capitalist’. One moment in time it will be “Why should the Soviets have all the fun remaking the world?”  and talk of the inevitability of socialism, then it will be ‘That wasn’t really Socialism’ or any one of the over 30 synonyms for the same ideological concept.

The problem for the Socialist-Left is that the same common elemental
crimes always appear no matter the current collectivist label de jour happens to be. This is exemplified by the following quote:

In certain basic respects – a totalitarian state
structure, a single party, a leader, a secret police, a hatred of
political, cultural and intellectual freedom – fascism and communism are
clearly more like each other than they are like anything in between.

Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Associate Professor of History at Harvard New York Times Magazine, Sunday, April 4, 1948

Despite assiduous efforts of the socialist-left in trying to re-write
history, it should be clear that no matter the smoke and mirrors, collectivist regimes are or were collectivist in nature.
People have begun to notice that there have been so many cases of
socialism being tried ending with inevitable failure that the excuses
are no longer operable. These have become so pervasive down the
centuries, that one of the socialist-left’s alternative methods
is to attempt distraction with claims that non-collectivist nations are
actually collectivist,
but that is a discussion for another day.

With socialism being contrary to human nature, it’s grandiose
promises can never be fulfilled. Thus a collectivist regime must have
multilayered means to oppress the people when this becomes obvious.

Such is the case with Chavismo in the wondrous revolutionary
spirit of Venezuela, a place where the emergency generators have to be
operated so much out of the normal procedure that they too are failing with many resultant deaths.  Seems like people tend to get a bit angry when they have to queue up for a meal only fit for a dog or eat garbage.

Then as is the case with every other collectivist regime, there have
to be police forces of many different configurations to watch, arrest,
torture and execute those that want to democratically change things. The
USSR had the Cheka or KGB, Nazi Germany had the Gestapo, the GDR had
the Stasi and in the case of Socialist Venezuela they have the SEBIN:

SEBIN enforcers fundamental to Maduro’s toolkit of repression

Tyrannical regimes generally employ repressive domestic intelligence
directorates to keep the opposition at bay. In Venezuela, the Bolivarian
National Intelligence Service (Servicio Bolivariano de Inteligencia Nacional — SEBIN), under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Popular Power for the Interior, Justice and Peace, is President Nicolás Maduro’s preferred tool of repression.

[..]

At El Helicoide, SEBIN’s headquarters, there are hundreds of political
prisoners held without medical treatment or access to visitations. Its
cells are the sites of cruel treatment, torture, corruption, poor
ventilation, overpopulation and lack of food and water. The SEBIN does
not need a warrant to hold people at El Helicoide; it has the authority
to keep people there even if a judge rules against it. Hence, arrests
without warrants and prosecutions of peaceful activists, flouting
Venezuela’s constitution, is a habit.

[..]

Former CIA operations officer Scott Uehlinger blames socialism for
Venezuela’s critical situation. The political environment indicates that
the nation is on the brink of a barbaric civil war. Based on the human
rights abuses perpetrated by the SEBIN, if the political disagreements
escalate between the government and the opposition, the Western world
could see one of the bloodiest civil wars of our time.

These are the enforcers of the revolution who torture people with asphyxiation and electric drills and force dissidents to eat excrement, but the Socialist-Left will try to tell you that Venezuela is supposedly ‘capitalist’.What
they don’t tell you is those representative republics with the economic
liberty of the free-market do not need these common criminal elements
to survive.

 

Originally published on the NOQ Report

Video: The Media Loves Mass Shootings.

 

“The mainstream media love mass shootings. I’m going to
say it again; the mainstream media love mass shootings…and you, the
#MSM, just put out the casting call for the next mass shooter.” – Colion
Noir

The latest video from NRATV’s Colion Noir – the Title says it all.

Published on Feb 21, 2018

Twitter – https://twitter.com/mrcolionnoir

Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/colionnoir/

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/COLIONNOIR/

 

Originally published on the NOQ Report